<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Super Bowl XLIV: Nothin&#8217; but a tease</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefurnace.firehouseagency.com/2010/02/08/super-bowl-xliv-nothin-but-a-tease/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefurnace.firehouseagency.com/2010/02/08/super-bowl-xliv-nothin-but-a-tease/</link>
	<description>Firehouse is an idea-driven ad agency and The Furnace is where we let out a lot of the stuff that lives in our heads. So read, play, comment and even challenge us and hopefully we will all get a little smarter.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:33:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://thefurnace.firehouseagency.com/2010/02/08/super-bowl-xliv-nothin-but-a-tease/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefurnace.firehouseagency.com/?p=1115#comment-121</guid>
		<description>For someone who so effectively wields the snark, you were surprisingly sparing with the D&#039;s and F&#039;s.  The work at the bottom of your scorecard certainly earned their places. Jim Nantz for FloTV, really...push it down.

There is some middlin&#039; stuff I might promote too. I&#039;d give the Dodge Charger spot better than a C.  Yeah, I know the Charger is not the car you&#039;d hope for in payoff position; but, hey, there are plenty of Ed Hardy fans (who I try to avoid even in crowded theaters). In our house, Google earned straight A&#039;s.  Now, my wife and kids were voting, and I&#039;m not the average Superbowl-watching dude.

And, strangely Dockers and FLO TV weren&#039;t the only victims of pod duplication.  Betty White got tackled in the same pod as Tebow&#039;s Mom.  Little people made appearances in back-to-back spots for Dr Pepper Cherry and truTV.  Some strange rotational coincidences indeed. And both Intel and Bud Light must agree that&#039;s what geeks look like - the casting in &quot;Asteroids&quot; and &quot;Sad Robot&quot; felt eerily similar.  

All said, your critique makes me look forward to next year.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For someone who so effectively wields the snark, you were surprisingly sparing with the D&#8217;s and F&#8217;s.  The work at the bottom of your scorecard certainly earned their places. Jim Nantz for FloTV, really&#8230;push it down.</p>
<p>There is some middlin&#8217; stuff I might promote too. I&#8217;d give the Dodge Charger spot better than a C.  Yeah, I know the Charger is not the car you&#8217;d hope for in payoff position; but, hey, there are plenty of Ed Hardy fans (who I try to avoid even in crowded theaters). In our house, Google earned straight A&#8217;s.  Now, my wife and kids were voting, and I&#8217;m not the average Superbowl-watching dude.</p>
<p>And, strangely Dockers and FLO TV weren&#8217;t the only victims of pod duplication.  Betty White got tackled in the same pod as Tebow&#8217;s Mom.  Little people made appearances in back-to-back spots for Dr Pepper Cherry and truTV.  Some strange rotational coincidences indeed. And both Intel and Bud Light must agree that&#8217;s what geeks look like &#8211; the casting in &#8220;Asteroids&#8221; and &#8220;Sad Robot&#8221; felt eerily similar.  </p>
<p>All said, your critique makes me look forward to next year.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
